![]() Trump’s lawyers suggest that recent coverage of the documents case shows the government is being selective and unfair when it raises concerns about national security, citing The Post’s reporting that materials involving a foreign country’s nuclear capabilities were among the documents seized. They did not address criminal statutes - including a part of the Espionage Act - that the government alleges may have been violated by keeping or hiding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump’s attorneys wrote in the filing that their interpretation of parts of the act suggest that Trump has “an absolute right to access” his presidential records. The former president’s lawyers also said that investigation of the documents should be centered around the Presidential Records Act - a civil law that says presidential records belong to the government, not the individual president. “But, again, the Government has not proven these records remain classified. “The Government contends that President Trump can have no such interest in the purported ‘classified records,’ the filing by Trump’s legal team reads. There were also dozens of empty folders marked classified, according to a government inventory filed in court, and documents marked confidential, secret and top-secret. The Justice Department has said in court filings that among the 100-plus classified documents taken in August, some were marked “HCS,” a category of highly classified government information that refers to “HUMINT Control Systems,” which are systems used to protect intelligence gathered from secret human sources. operations that are so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them. Those people also said some of the seized documents detail top-secret U.S. The Washington Post has reported that among the documents seized by the FBI was one describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, according to people familiar with the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss it. The filing also says there is no indication that the “purported ‘classified records’ were disclosed to anyone.” A section of their 21-page filing outlines a president’s power to declassify documents, but does not say Trump actually declassified the material before he left office. Trump’s lawyers argued that the government “has not proven” that the materials marked classified are actually still classified. In their filing, Trump lawyers disagree, charging that prosecutors are overstating the national-security concerns and that “there is no indication any purported ‘classified records’ were disclosed to anyone.” The filing was submitted by four members of Trump’s legal team: Christopher Kise, Lindsey Halligan, Evan Corcoran and James Trusty. ![]() The government also asked Cannon to exempt the classified documents from outside examination, saying that requiring such a review would unnecessarily complicate the national security issues in the high-profile case. 8.įederal prosecutors asked Cannon to withhold her ruling that the FBI not use the more than 100 classified documents seized in the search until they are reviewed by the special master, essentially an outside legal expert. Cannon to temporarily suspend parts of her Labor Day order, in which she agreed to appoint a special master to review thousands of documents seized by the FBI in a court-approved search of Trump’s club and residence on Aug. Their filing was in response to the Justice Department’s request for U.S. “In what at its core is a document storage dispute that has spiraled out of control, the Government wrongfully seeks to criminalize the possession by the 45th President of his own Presidential and personal records,” the Trump lawyers wrote, arguing that prosecutors are trying to limit any outside review of “what it deems are ‘classified records.’ ” Lawyers for former president Donald Trump filed court papers Monday arguing against any pause in a judge’s order for a special master to review documents seized at Mar-a-Lago last month, suggesting that some of the documents marked classified may not be, and that Trump may have the right to keep the materials in his possession.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |